|
Reports
The Flight of the Creative Class
A Policy Forum on The Intangible Economy with Richard Florida
The Recipe for Entrepreneurship —
Three “Ts:”
America’s edge in creativity and
innovation is threatened by poor policy and an atmosphere of
neglect, author and economic development professor Richard Florida
told a June 19 panel forum hosted by the Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars. Speaking at a discussion of his
new book The Fall of the Creative Class, Florida painted a bleak
picture for the future of economic growth, urging lawmakers to take
immediate steps to revitalize “creativity” that he said was vital to
preserve America’s lead in entrepreneurial activities and culture.
“Boy, we’ve got a big problem on our hands,” he concluded,
reflecting on the current state of the country’s ability to attract
and retain top-notch creative talent.
Florida’s speech and his book are based on his own three-part recipe
for entrepreneurship: technology; talent; and tolerance. He
criticized the conventional economic wisdom that has long considered
labor a “stock” resource, similar to other classical factors of
production. Instead, Florida argued that entrepreneurial talent is
highly mobile and flowing, forcing the U.S. to compete in a global
marketplace for the freshest and brightest minds.
Because it lags such emerging leaders as China in classical
variables that create comparative advantages, such as market size,
manufacturing efficiency and raw resources, Florida maintained that
it is a unique entrepreneurial spirit that can help America compete.
While his first two “Ts” are important in building such a spirit,
Florida argued that it is the third — tolerance — that provides the
potential for bringing the biggest short- and long-term marginal
benefits through policies that are “proactively inclusive.”
Challenges for Talent:
Foreign actors have played a tremendous role in meeting the American
thirst for talent that drives its entrepreneurial economy, Florida
said. For example, foreign-born Chinese or Indians founded more than
a third of high-tech Silicon Valley companies started in the 1990s,
and more than half of current American engineering students come
from outside the country. However, the U.S. faces key challenges in
attracting these key innovators:
-
Other countries have “gotten
hip to the talent thing” while the U.S. has become less so
Universities in other countries, in particular, Canada, have
become highly competitive challengers in the race to attract
foreign students and workers. In a survey of students in Canada,
most said that America was their most-preferred destination but
that they were deterred from attending because of the stringent
visa regulations of the post-9/11 era and what they view as a
climate of antipathy toward foreigners. The problem is
especially pressing, as the U.S. ranks just eleventh in the
number of people in its “creative class,” who go on to become
entrepreneurs and inventors.
-
U.S. fails to tap the creative
energies of a large portion of its population
Two recent advents, Florida argued, have created the perception
of the 30 percent of the population involved in entrepreneurial
and innovative activities as social and economic elites. A
growing socio-economic class divide has created two distinct
groups of “creative haves” and “creative have-nots,” with the
latter rebelling against innovation-friendly policies like
research-and-development funding in favor of class-specific
benefits. Similarly, a growing political polarization that stems
from that class divide has created a societal recoil against new
ideas and those who espouse them.
-
Innovators priced out of
entrepreneurial hubs
Even when engineers and scientists overcome visa hurdles, few
can afford to live near universities and corporate epicenters
that serve as leaders in incubating new technologies and ideas.
The housing affordability crisis, Florida said, has literally
priced out new creative minds.
Skeptic’s Questions:
Himself a highly distinguished author of books on technology and
economic growth, Progressive Policy Institute President Rob Atkinson
offered a cautious assessment of Florida’s conclusion that a culture
of inclusion was the biggest hurdle in the future of the American
economy.
Calling the book cogent and well written, Atkinson said he believed
that Florida had overstated the importance of immigration and
foreign labor in the “creative class,” and the role of the entire
class, as a whole. While the competition for foreign talent may be
global, Atkinson said he was skeptical that American workers would
move overseas in large numbers in a search for more tolerant or
economically equitable societies. The most pressing problem,
Atkinson concluded, was not in America’s pool of talent but in the
wages it offers to skilled workers, making the country a less
attractive place for new enterprises.
Instead of people, Atkinson argued that technological innovation
would drive future economic growth in the U.S. Atkinson also
criticized Florida for failing to offer any concrete public policy
proposals needed to bring about the changes he says are needed. |
FURTHER
SOURCES
Reports/Papers
Organizations
Publications
Books
Portals
Government
Kauffman
Index of Entrepreneurial Activity

Read the
report
Search for entrepreneurship papers and
reports on Google Scholar
|