If you have problems viewing this email go to http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/news/nde-news.htm



Week of May 12 - 18, 2008


The World’s Top Business Gurus

The Wall Street Journal has recently published an interesting ranking of the world’s 100 top “business gurus,” i.e., the most influential writers and thinkers on today’s business issues. The list, which was last published in 2003, was compiled in collaboration with Babson College Professor Thomas H. Davenport, and it ranks individuals by academic citations, Google hits, and other media citations. This year’s list includes an eclectic mix of people and is people by journalists, psychologists, authors, and fewer business school professors than in past rankings. It appears that producing new ideas in an easily digestible form is as important as developing new ideas alone. This year’s top five business thinkers are (in rank order): Gary Hamel, author of, among others, The Future of Management; Thomas Friedman of The New York Times; Microsoft’s Bill Gates; Malcolm Gladwell, author of Blink and The Tipping Point; and Howard Gardner, a Harvard psychologist best known for the theory of “multiple intelligences,” and the editor of Responsibility at Work.

“New Breed of Business Gurus Rises,” by Erin White appears in the May 5, 2008 issue of The Wall Street Journal.


Boosting Canada’s Innovation Performance

While Canada remains a prosperous nation, its productivity growth record has been poor when compared to other developed economies. A new study from Canada’s Institute for Research and Public Policy seeks to understand why and to see whether any potential solutions are available. The author, Donald McFetridge, fingers the business sector’s lack of innovation and entrepreneurial spirit as primary cause for Canada’s productivity lag. While the Canadian government has introduced multiple programs to stimulate innovation, the national innovation culture is still quite weak. McFetridge contends that new innovation policies should focus on supporting “market incentives for entrepreneurship” through reduced taxes and regulation. This effort would also entail support for “higher quality venture capital,” which in practice means ending subsidies for Canadian investors and opening up local markets to foreign venture investors. While critical of many Canadian government initiatives, McFetridge does recommend continuation of efforts to fund technology commercialization from universities, to build university-business partnerships, and to enhance technology training opportunities across the education spectrum.

Download the April 2008 Canadian Institute for Research and Public Policy report, Innovation and the Productivity Problem: Any Solutions?, by Donald G. McFetridge.


The Importance of Technology Diffusion

While the creation of new technologies is essential, the diffusion of technology also matters. After all, the benefits of new technologies are limited if they cannot be widely used. A new Harvard Business School research study takes a closer look at the processes of technology diffusion. The authors, Diego Comin and Bart Hobijn, develop a model that helps trace the path of new technology adoption across countries. More specifically, the researchers assessed the technology diffusion paths of fifteen technologies across 166 countries between 1820 and 2003. They find that technology adoption lags can be quite long. On average, countries have adopted technologies 47 years after their invention. Not surprisingly, adoption lags have grown shorter over time. Reducing adoption lags, as has occurred in East Asia, can have a big impact on a country’s economic prospects. Cross-country variations in the adoption of new technologies accounts for about one-quarter of the difference in national per capita incomes.

Download the 2008 Harvard Business School research paper (#08-093), “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion,” by Diego A. Comin and Bart Hobijn.


Future Directions for Nanotechnology

President Bush’s National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel (NNAP) has recently released its latest recommendations for how US government agencies can most effectively support new innovations in nanotechnology. The NNAP, first chartered in 2003 regularly reviews and reports on the state of Federal support for nanotech research and development. The latest review focuses on the potential health risks from nanotechnology, and finds that nanotech research does not raise any unique or especially challenging ethical issues. In fact, the NNAP report is quite positive on the state of nanotechnology research, applauding current Federal programs that support R&D and needed infrastructure investments. The NNAP recommends a continued focus on key infrastructure, such as research centers, instrumentation, and equipment. It also recommends a renewed commitment to developing consensus national and international standards for nanotechnology. Finally, the NNAP encourages expanded investments in technology transfer so that new products and technologies can be commercialized in a more efficient manner.

Download the April 2008 report, The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Second Assessment and Recommendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel.


Venture Capital Industry Slowing

The latest data (from the first quarter of 2008) indicate that the venture capital (VC) industry is slowing along with the rest of the economy. Venture capitalists invested $7.1 billion in 922 deals during the first quarter of 2008. This figure, while impressive, still represents an 8.5% drop from the previous quarter. VC fundraising slowed even more. The total amount raised in the first quarter of 2008 ($6.3 billion) was down 31% from the same period in 2007. Finally, VC-backed exits slowed even further, with only one initial public offering and 56 mergers and acquisitions in the beginning of 2008. These figures represent the lowest quarterly exit levels since 2003.

View the latest MoneyTree reports from PriceWaterhouseCoopers and the National Venture Capital Association.


Leader in Women’s Investment Movement Honored

Stephanie Hanbury-Brown – founder of a network of angel investors who identify and invest in women-led ventures – was named as the recipient of the 2008 Hans Severiens Award. The award, presented by the Angel Capital Association (ACA) and Angel Capital Education Foundation (ACEF), recognizes individual accomplishments in the advancement of angel investing in expanding entrepreneurship. Hanbury-Brown founded Golden Seeds LLC in 2005 to identify and invest in women-led ventures with the potential to grow into multi-million dollar businesses and to provide women entrepreneurs with strategic business advice and the tools they need for growth. Since its inception, Golden Seeds has invested in 18 companies for approximately $6.7 million. Hanbury-Brown also serves as chairperson of the board of Count Me In, a non-profit involved in online micro-lending for U.S. women entrepreneurs, and a source of inspiration and mentorship inspiring women to “Make Mine a Million Dollar Business.”

Learn more about the Angel Capital Association and Angel Capital Education Foundation.

Learn more about Golden Seeds LLC.


The National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship is an initiative of the Public Forum Institute made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City. Through NDE-news, we bring you short summaries and analyses of various trends driving entrepreneurship around the world. Subscribe now to receive your weekly copy. Archived issues are available online.


Kauffman Foundation The Public Forum Institute

National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship

Mark Marich, Editor

All stories © 2008 The Public Forum Institute
Content from this newsletter may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship and a link to www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde.