If you have problems viewing this email go to http://www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde/news/nde-news.htm



Week of February 11 - 17, 2008


A Glimpse at the President's Budget Plan

Last week, President Bush presented his final budget plan (for Fiscal Year 2009). As usual, the President’s plan is the first gambit in what will likely be a protracted battle over Federal spending priorities. Budget experts expect a prolonged debate that may even drag into 2009, when a new President enters office. Nonetheless, it’s helpful to examine the budget plan to get a good sense of current White House priorities. Here are a few highlights:

  • The budget includes spending increases on research and development programs—such as the National Science Foundation---that were originally part of the President’s American Competitiveness Initiative. Overall, the Bush budget envisions a 3.3% hike in Federal R&D spending, up to a total of $145.4 billion.

  • Total FY2009 spending will reach $3.1 trillion, with roughly 1/3 of that total devoted to discretionary spending. Overall discretionary spending will rise by 4.9 percent, with most of the funds supporting defense activities.

  • The deficit is expected to reach $407 billion in FY2009, a major increase of nearly $300 billion from the FY 2007 deficit of $162 billion.

  • The budget seeks a permanent extension of the President’s previous tax cuts, which are set to expire in 2010

  • The budget includes slight spending increases for some domestic programs, such as State Children’s Health Insurance Program and the No Child Left Behind education efforts.

  • The budget generally slashes domestic programs with 151 programs facing the prospect of major budget cuts in this plan.

Access a copy of President Bush’s Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2009.


High Growth Entrepreneurs in the UK

An interesting series of new reports from Great Britain’s National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship assess the impact and motivations of Britain’s high-growth entrepreneurs and their companies. The first survey examines the backgrounds of the founders of Britain’s 100 fastest-growing businesses. Seventy percent of these founders hold graduate degrees. Among technology firms, 84% hold graduate degrees. A second survey assesses the factors driving women to start their own companies. The primary motivations were related to passion about the business, wanting to make a difference, or desiring a more independent lifestyle. Money is an important, but not overriding, concern for these women entrepreneurs. Other factors, such as being one’s own boss, are more important than financial considerations in terms of pushing women toward entrepreneurial aspirations. A third survey catalogs the state of entrepreneurship education in Britain’s higher education system. At present, 127 higher educational institutions in the UK provide some sort of entrepreneurship education programming and support.

Learn more about the National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship and access recent research reports at www.ncge.com


How Well are SBA Programs Working?

FA new series of evaluations of leading Small Business Administration (SBA) programs should help counter a string of criticisms the agency has faced in recent years about the about the quality and effectiveness of its programs. The evaluations, led by researchers at the Urban Institute, assessed the performance of key SBA programs, like the 7(a), 504 and microenterprise lending programs. The evaluation team produced six reports on different aspects of these programs. Their main conclusions were quite positive. SBA programs generally do a good job of serving customers who cannot be effectively supported by banks and other private financing sources. These customers tend to be quite satisfied with SBA’s support, and, most importantly, their firms showed performance gains after receiving SBA assistance.

Learn more about the Urban Institute’s “Evaluation of the Small Business Administration’s Loan and Investment Programs.”


New Data on African-American Entrepreneurship

African-American entrepreneurs face a pretty challenging set of circumstances when it comes to starting businesses and accessing capital to start or grow a business. New research sponsored by the US Census Bureau shows that African-Americans still lag Caucasians in many categories of business ownership and growth. In 2000, roughly 11.4% of white workers were self-employed, compared to only 4.8% of African-American workers. Meanwhile, these African-American-owned companies have lower sales, lower payrolls, and fewer employees than White or Asian-owned firms. Not surprisingly, these firms are also less profitable and more likely to close. The researchers contend that these disparities result from a vicious cycle facing African-American entrepreneurs. They tend to start with significantly lower levels of wealth. This problem is further compounded by significant capital access barriers facing these new business owners. Even when credit histories and other factors are controlled, African-American business owners are less likely to receive loans and more likely to avoid applying due to fear of denial. The researchers conclude that policy makers must take a variety of steps to reduce discrimination in credit markets. They also support financial literacy and other business training programs for aspiring business owners as well as new initiatives, such as first-time home buyer support or individual development accounts (IDAs) that help individuals build assets that can be used to support new business ventures.

Access the December 2006 US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Working Paper (CES 06-33), “Access to Financial Capital Among U.S. Businesses: The Case of African-American Firms,” by Alicia M. Robb and Robert W. Fairlie.


Microfinance in China

While entrepreneurship continues to boom in China, the country has not been a major player in the field of microfinance. Because of a legacy of tight government regulation of financial markets, China has not developed a home-grown microenterprise industry, especially in its more isolated rural regions. A recent Knowledge@Wharton article examines the current state of play. The basic challenge in China is that banks are often unwilling to enter rural microfinance markets without clearer guidance from the central government. At the same time, potential investors have limited understanding of the potential size and profitability of the rural marketplace. Two major players—the China Postal Savings and Remittance Bureau, and the Agricultural Bank of China---could become major forces in rural microfinance. However, both institutions would require significant reforms in their operating procedures and business strategies if they hope to succeed in this market niche.

To access the January 2008 Knowledge@Wharton article, “China’s Shifting Microfinance Landscape: Shifting Players, Old Problems.”


The National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship is an initiative of the Public Forum Institute made possible by a grant from the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas City. Through NDE-news, we bring you short summaries and analyses of various trends driving entrepreneurship around the world. Subscribe now to receive your weekly copy. Archived issues are available online.


Kauffman Foundation The Public Forum Institute

National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship

Mark Marich, Editor

All stories © 2008 The Public Forum Institute
Content from this newsletter may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the National Dialogue on Entrepreneurship and a link to www.publicforuminstitute.org/nde.